The Democratic Party Is Literally Dying

The dead hand of gerontocracy is also a symptom of ideological malaise.

The late Representative Gerry Connolly—in a photograph from 2013.(Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

In theory, the Democratic Party is a political organization aimed at gaining power and implementing an agenda. In practice, the Democrats more closely resemble a hospice, if not a funeral home. An inordinately large number of party leaders are so old and infirm they are at death’s door. This is most notoriously true of the party’s most recent standard-bearer, former president Joe Biden. A recent media controversy over a new book alleging that Biden’s inner circle had covered up his infirmity was overshadowed on Sunday by revelations that he suffers from an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

On Wednesday, Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly—a lightning rod in the debates over his party’s gerontocracy when in December 2024 he defeated the much younger Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to be the top Democrat in the House Oversight Committee—died of cancer at age 74. Connolly’s cancer had been made public last November. His victory over AOC—who is nearly four decades his junior, free of life-threatening diseases, and one of the most telegenic of elected officials in modern politics—was a dramatic illustration of how much the Democrats value seniority above all other considerations. Connolly’s brief tenure as ranking Democrat in the Oversight Committee abruptly ended in April after his cancer prevented him from doing the job. Sadly, instead of being a career highlight, Connolly’s truncated time at that post relegated him to the growing list of American public figures who didn’t know when to quit. This hall of infamy also includes Joe Biden, the late Senator Dianne Feinstein and the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsburg.

In a post, the political analyst Lakshya Jain listed some startling facts showing just how sharply elected Democrats skew towards the elderly:

Three of the 215 House Democrats have died this year, all from states that Trump won (TX/AZ) or have a Republican Governor (TX/VA). Six House Democrats have died since April 2024. The last eight House members to die in office have been Democrats, going back to 2022.

I think the question here is whether we realize that this is simply not a coincidence—it’s the result of decisions made regarding seniority and running for re-election.

One last point: 11 of the 14 House members over 80 are Democrats.

In a Congress where Republicans have only a thin hold on power, every vote counts. On Thursday, Congress passed the reconciliation bill by a vote of 215–214, with two Republicans breaking rank. As Branko Marcetic of Jacobin points out, “Three Democrats who would’ve made the losing vote 214-217 died in office this year. So basically, the budget Democrats have warned non-stop is a disaster will pass directly because of their insistence they stay in Congress until death.”

Jain is right to insist that the Democratic Party gerontocracy is a result of choice, not just coincidence. While both Republicans and Democrats have elderly members, Democrats in particular have elevated seniority to a governing principle, meaning that party leadership is dominated by the aged.

VEJA  Lawmakers in Washington press for more security following Minnesota shooting : NPR

In December, Politico pointed out that this dynamic remained in place even after the election of Donald Trump, which should have caused a major shake-up in the party—but in fact left the status quo largely unchanged. Politico notes:

It’s revealing that even after the ouster of three 70-somethings from ranking spots on committees—Reps. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), David Scott (D-Ga.), and Nadler—top Democrats on 10 different committees in the next Congress will be over 70 years old. Two of them are octogenarians, including 86-year-old Representative Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), who will be ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee.

The GOP House chairmen these Democrats will be up against aren’t exactly spring chickens. But Republicans will have half the number of 70-plus-year-olds serving in the top spot. Two GOP chairmen will be more than 25 years younger than their Democratic counterpart on the committee. In part, it’s a function of the term limits imposed on committee leaders by the House GOP conference. Democrats, by contrast, are wedded to seniority as the basis of power.

Current Issue

Cover of June 2025 Issue

Their devotion to seniority makes clear that gerontocracy is merely a symptom of a deeper issue: The Democrats have no guiding ideology or principles holding them together. The party is a heterogenous coalition of centrists and progressives that has failed to define a core goal. Even anti-Trumpism, which served as an effective glue for holding the faction-ridden party together from 2016 to 2024, is no longer effective. Trump’s victory over Biden has demoralized the party, and some leading figures in purple states are all too eager to stay on the good side of MAGA.

It’s increasingly difficult to know what Democrats, as a collectivity, believe. This explains why the party continues to be unpopular even though Trump himself is also losing popularity.

On Tuesday, Vox reported, “Congressional Democrats—and their party’s national brand—remain dismal: Some 37 percent of voters view the party favorably, while about 60 percent view them unfavorably, according to YouGov’s tracking surveys.”

Lacking a cohesive party ideology, each Democratic lawmaker is in effect a warlord ruling over a small fiefdom. For warlords, the game is to hold power over the fiefdom until you die. If the Democrats had some larger vision of the social good, then one could expect politicians to sacrifice their career for that goal. Sadly, the only common vision seems to be careerism.

Earlier this month, David Hogg, the controversial vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, stirred up anger by going on Real Time with Bill Maher and saying, “There’ve been a few members that have come out, that have said, ‘if I retire my life is effectively over.’… Get over yourself. This isn’t about you.” Not surprisingly, the DNC is now trying to remove Hogg. As my Nation colleague Chris Lehmann rightly laments, this push against Hogg is being argued for (at least in public) on merely procedural grounds without any effort to engage with the substantive points Hogg made about the party needing to replace incumbents who lack energy.

VEJA  Richard L. Bean Detention Center Head Will Leave After “Loss of Confidence” in His Leadership — ProPublica

In his comments on Real Time, Hogg alluded to a comment Representative James Clyburn, age 84, made when asked by The Wall Street Journal about retirement: “What do you want—me to give up my life?” Last week, when asked about this comment, Clyburn denied he ever made it but then expressed the same sentiment in an even more extreme form: “Do you want me to commit suicide?” Politics is the great divider; infirmity and death are the great uniters. It’s possible on a human level to have empathy for Biden, Connolly, and Clyburn: It’s hard for any of us, in our frailty, to confront evidence of diminishment and impending death. But this sympathy for a shared human plight, for the King Lear that lives in all our souls, shouldn’t blind us to the political reality. In a democracy, politicians exist to serve the public; the public does not exist to serve politicians. It’s a sign of democratic decline if politicians live and die like warlords, clinging to every last ounce of power. Democrats need to define what they stand for as a party so their elected officials can once more be genuine public servants and not mere warlords.

Jeet Heer



Jeet Heer is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation and host of the weekly Nation podcast, The Time of Monsters. He also pens the monthly column “Morbid Symptoms.” The author of In Love with Art: Francoise Mouly’s Adventures in Comics with Art Spiegelman (2013) and Sweet Lechery: Reviews, Essays and Profiles (2014), Heer has written for numerous publications, including The New Yorker, The Paris Review, Virginia Quarterly Review, The American Prospect, The GuardianThe New Republic, and The Boston Globe.

More from
Jeet Heer Jeet Heer Illustration

Elon Musk’s Real Drug Problem Is Much Worse Than You Think

What happens when you mix ketamine, ecstasy, and mushrooms with far-right ideology? Spoiler: The results aren’t pretty.

Jeet Heer

Michael Ledeen on floral sofa in front of plants and a window facing trees in sunshine.

From Iran-contra to Iraq war WMD lies to Trumpism, this right-wing pundit kept subverting democracy. 

Jeet Heer

President Donald Trump gestures on stage as he tours the Al Udeid Air Base on May 15, 2025, in Doha, Qatar.

A threatened judiciary cannot rely on cops controlled by the White House.

Jeet Heer

President Donald J. Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman attend a bilateral meeting at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

The president’s much-touted foreign policy shake-up is blighted by continued support for genocide.

Jeet Heer

Reaping what they sowed: Biden and Harris at Trump’s inauguration.

The former president’s stubbornness and narcissism led to disastrous Trump victory.

Jeet Heer

Hiding in plain sight: Despite the epic scale of his crypto-linked corruption, Trump is unlikely to ever face justice. Especially with so many Democrats eager to take the industry’s (real) money.

The president is a brazen crook, but Democrats are too compromised to challenge him.

Jeet Heer


Postagem recentes

DEIXE UMA RESPOSTA

Por favor digite seu comentário!
Por favor, digite seu nome aqui

Stay Connected

0FãsCurtir
0SeguidoresSeguir
0InscritosInscrever
Publicidade

Vejá também

EcoNewsOnline
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.