The Supreme Court Allows Trump Officials to Deport Migrants to “Third Countries”

The Supreme Court ruled from its emergency docket that the Trump administration could temporarily send immigrants to third-party countries with which they have no connection.

Migrants from Guatemala are deported to their country with a United States military plane at the Fort Bliss facility in El Paso, Texas, on January 30, 2025.

(Christian Torres / Anadolu via Getty Images)

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court’s six conservative judges ruled that, while cases were proceeding in the lower courts, the Trump administration could temporarily resume its rapid deportation of immigrants to third-party countries with which they have no connection. Trump officials immediately announced that they would challenge a lower court’s injunction preventing them from deporting eight men, currently being housed in a converted shipping container on an airbase in Djibouti, to South Sudan, a country that seven of the eight detainees had no links to.

The eight men in Djibouti represent low-hanging fruit for an administration hell-bent on inflicting pain, fear, and the threat of physical and mental harm on immigrants. They are from Myanmar, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Mexico, and—one of them—South Sudan. All have been convicted of violent offenses, according to the administration. In other words, they are unlikely to trigger much public sympathy and are, in consequence, perfect lab rats upon whom to test-run a grotesque new expulsion-into-exile policy and executive power theory.

Late last month, the eight men were bundled, with virtually no advance notice, onto transport planes and flown to Djibouti, with an intended final destination of South Sudan. Because a judge in Boston intervened, issuing an injunction against their deportation to South Sudan, they were kept in limbo in Djibouti, where, for the past month, they have been guarded around the clock by a roster of DHS agents.

Now the administration wants to fast-track their deportation to one of the poorest and most violent countries on earth.

There is literally no legitimate reason to deport these men to South Sudan. On a scale of zero to 100, WorldData.com gives the country zero for civil rights and for health, and it awards the country 92 (listed as “catastrophic”) on its corruption index. Indeed, the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Center lists South Sudan as having a “kleptocratic dynamic” and reports that “it regularly ranks at or near the bottom of international corruption indices. Corruption is systemic across all levels of government and pervades nearly every economic sector, and perpetrators enjoy widespread impunity.”

The average per capita income in South Sudan is $460 per year, and the total GDP of the entire economy is just $3 billion, about one ten-thousandth of the US GDP. Elon Musk could buy the country 150 times over and still come out ahead. More than one in five South Sudanese suffers from HIV/AIDS, and one in 40 has tuberculosis.

The World Health Organization estimates that the life expectancy for a South Sudanese resident is a mere 58 years. After independence from Sudan, in 2011, South Sudan fell into years of civil war; and even though that conflict has now officially ended, the Council on Foreign Relations reports that intercommunal violence is ongoing and that “the country continues to suffer from one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.” Because of the prevalence of kidnapping and armed conflict, the State Department has a “do not travel” advisory for South Sudan, listing it as Level 4—its highest warning level—because of the likelihood that travelers will experience extreme violence.

This is the country that Trump will now be deporting immigrants to. It is astounding that the Supreme Court seems comfortable giving its imprimatur to this idea.

In her scathing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that “the Government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law, free to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard.” She went on to say that, in consequence, the Supreme Court’s intervention in the case could well lead to “exposing thousands to the risk of torture or death.”

Within hours of the ruling, DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin confirmed these fears, gloating that it was time to “fire up the deportation planes.”

This is all being done in the name of the American people, in our names. It is a calculated, deliberate deportation of migrants into harm’s way. There is simply no other explanation for why the administration would send anyone to South Sudan. It is the use of atrocious conditions to terrify migrants into either self-deporting or not coming to the US in the first place; it is also, quite possibly, the use of these atrocious conditions to further dehumanize immigrants. After all, it seems inconceivable that the courts would allow for US citizens to be sent to a place the State Department has basically identified as on a par with one of Dante’s circles of hell; if the courts do permanently permit immigrants to be sent there, then doesn’t that legitimize the MAGA ideology that they are lesser beings, vested with lesser rights than are the rest of us and inured to otherwise unendurable conditions? It’s not too different a psychological argument than that used by the Nazis in ghettoizing the Jews, and then further demonizing them and questioning their humanity for their lice-riddled bodies and clothes, their filthy appearances, their manifest poverty after having spent months in those ghettoes.

When I was heading to a hotel in New York City last week, my cab driver kept switching his radio from one hard-right talking head to the next. Each was laser-focused on undocumented immigrants, and each was more bilious than the last. There was Kristi Noem reading aloud a PSA condemning undocumented immigrants for an array of blood-curdling crimes. There was someone else talking about rapist and pedophile migrants. There was someone ranting about immigrants taking jobs and benefits from Americans.

For them, immigrants are bad people—the sort of people who deserve to get bundled onto aircraft and flown half away around the world to be dropped off in a violent country where everything will conspire not just against their chances of success but even against their prospects for survival. For them, all undocumented immigrants are desperadoes, rather than, as most of them are, ordinary people trying to secure safety and education and opportunity, decent wages and clean environments, and steady food supplies for themselves and their families.

Not one of these opinion-shapers mentioned America’s glorious heritage as a country big enough, physically and spiritually, to welcome in migrants by the millions. Not one acknowledged the overwhelming economic and cultural benefits migration has delivered over the centuries.

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free… and I will give them a one-way ticket to the newest circle of Dante’s hell.” It doesn’t have quite the same ring to it as the original “New Colossus” poem, but, I fear, it speaks more honestly to the state of things in the America of 2025.


Every day,
The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of power through clear-eyed, uncompromising independent journalism—the kind of journalism that holds the powerful to account and helps build alternatives to the world we live in now. 

We have just the right people to confront this moment. Speaking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the complex terms of the budget bill into the plain truth, describing it as “the single largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of legislation in our history.” In the pages of the June print issue and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American campaign finance, revealing that it was the top donor in the 2024 elections as an industry and won nearly every race it supported.

This is all in addition to The Nation’s exceptional coverage of matters of war and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, climate, immigration, healthcare, and much more.

Our 160-year history of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has prepared us for this moment. 2025 marks a new chapter in this history, and we need you to be part of it.

We’re aiming to raise $20,000 during our June Fundraising Campaign to fund our change-making reporting and analysis. Stand for bold, independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward, 

Katrina vanden Heuvel 
Publisher, The Nation

Sasha Abramsky

Sasha Abramsky is The Nation‘s Western correspondent. He is the author of several books, including The American Way of Poverty, The House of Twenty Thousand Books, Little Wonder: The Fabulous Story of Lottie Dod, the World’s First Female Sports Superstar, and most recently Chaos Comes Calling: The Battle Against the Far-Right Takeover of Small-Town America. Follow him on Bluesky at @sashaabramsky.bsky.social.

More from The Nation

Who Needs the “New York Times” Editorial Board?

In his weekly newsletter, Elie Mystal argues that the Democratic Party that can defeat MAGA is not the Democratic Party that can win the endorsement of The New York Times.

Elie Mystal

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani travels by subway to the “No Kings” protest in Bryant Park, New York City, on June 14, 2025.

Mamdani understood what the people who tried to demonize him did not: that voters aren’t buying the same old smears about Palestine anymore.

Y.L. Al-Sheikh

New York mayoral candidate state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani (D-NY) greets voters with Democratic mayoral candidate Michael Blake on 161st Street on June 24, 2025, in the South Bronx in New York City.

Once they get over the shock, the idea-starved Democrats at the national level should learn from Zohran Mamdani: actually give citizens something to vote for.

Chris Lehmann

Zohran Mamdani with supporters in Brooklyn on May 4, 2025.

Mamdani won by uplifting and uniting some of New York City’s most forgotten voters. His coalition now has a chance to transform what’s possible for people everywhere.

Waleed Shahid


VEJA  Supreme Court gives Trump a wave of victories in final week : NPR

Postagem recentes

DEIXE UMA RESPOSTA

Por favor digite seu comentário!
Por favor, digite seu nome aqui

Stay Connected

0FãsCurtir
0SeguidoresSeguir
0InscritosInscrever
Publicidade

Vejá também

EcoNewsOnline
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.