A DNC Member Is Calling for an Arms Embargo on Israel. Will the Party Leadership Listen?

AM: I think it starts by acknowledging that this issue is not just something brought forward by me alone. It’s a conversation that is had by voters across the country right now, where we see that only 7 percent of Democrats support the Democratic Party’s current position [on Israel’s military action in Gaza] as of polling last week. So this is not just a sentiment that is echoed by one DNC member. This is the entire Democratic base that is really calling for this change, but also for a more clearly communicated stance. I think that there’s a much larger base of people that are really pushing this, and I’m just one person that has the opportunity and position through having a membership seat on the DNC to do it.

I’m a newer member, so this is one of the first opportunities that I’ve had to have any say in this matter. Part of it is just related to timing, but I do think that something else that’s worth noting is that there have been conversations over ceasefires for years now, and now it’s been several years throughout this crisis. There has to be a shift in exactly how we talk about this, because we can’t keep having the same conversation on loop.

Everybody can agree that we want this humanitarian crisis to end. But so long as we just keep calling for the same old same old, you’re not gonna expect to see too much of a shift.

ZA: The Democratic majority for Israel has condemned your resolution. They say it “does not even mention October 7.” And hostages are a key concern in chairman Ken Martin’s counter-resolution. What is your response to them?

AM: Democratic elected officials have the ability—some of them through votes—to influence what weapons and what aid does or does not reach the region. And so while we can talk about Hamas and the horror and atrocities that have ensued, we cannot have that conversation if we’re not acknowledging the role that the Democratic Party and our elected officials have in shaping that conversation.

There is a more direct line between the US government and Israel than there is between the US government and Hamas. Any conversation that doesn’t acknowledge that just simply isn’t rooted in the reality of where we are right now. We have elected officials that vote on bills which supply weapons and aid to the region. So I think what’s really important is that that’s what’s within our control. I don’t think that it would fully do it justice if we made promises that we can’t keep.

ZA: You’re 26 and one of the younger members of the DNC. Did you face any pushback when proposing this resolution? Of course, you have the chair putting out a counter-resolution, but what was the environment like for you to propose such an idea?

AM: The amount of support that I’ve heard from other members—but also just from everyday people and voters, ones that I organize with here in Florida but also just ones that have reached out from across the country—really just shows that there is a large disconnect between party leadership and the voters.

There’s a big push, obviously, from the top down, to try and silence this conversation, because ultimately the party leadership is not in line with the voters. So my hope is that starting this conversation for the first time in a formal setting in the DNC could be the larger push for voters to kind of reclaim the control of the party.

ZA: What are you anticipating on August 26?

AM: A conversation that might just be the start—but definitely will not be the end—of talking about Gaza and the humanitarian crisis within the Democratic Party. But I also anticipate that there will probably be divisiveness, but it’s long overdue. And I think that it’s now or never.

ZA: What do you have to say to Americans who don’t side with the Republican Party and Trump’s agenda but also feel untethered by the current agenda of the Democratic Party—especially when it comes to its current stance on Israel?

Well, I can speak as one of those same Democrats, and what I will say is that for every time that you have felt hopeless or for every time that you have felt frustrated, there is the unique opportunity to get more involved. So I urge people, if you don’t feel represented within the party structure, to run into the fire, to join your local Democratic executive committee, to join your local Young Dems chapter, and to really start having these conversations.

So often I think that we view power as something distant, but if you are willing to put yourself out there, and if you are willing to have the conversation, ultimately, the majority of people you know adopt the same position that we’re talking about right now. Had I not made that decision to run, and had I not made that decision to really represent the voices of the Young Dems that I organize with, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. I think it just goes to show that anybody can and should step up and have a say, because we all have an equal claim in it.

ZA: Anything else the people should know?

AM: Leadership can get comfortable, or can even want to shy away from conversation, to stop conflict, and I think that there have to be hard conversations. This is one of those times.